Parliamentary and Presidential Systems Essay - 1621 Words.

Presidential vs. Parliamentary There are two main types of political systems, one being a presidential system and the other being a parliamentary system.Both of them have their own benefits as well as their own disadvantages. No political system can be perfect or can always have stability, but shown in history there are successful countries that use either one.

Parliamentary and Presidential System The Parliamentary system or Presidential System are two most important governance systems in the world which are effectively in place in most of the countries. In Parliamentary system, executive is directly or indirectly dependent on the legislature whereas in Presidential System of governance, the executive branch exists and presides separately from the.

Parliamentary System And Presidential System - In modern society, political parties serve as a link between state and society. Anton Downs wrote a well-known definition for political parties as “a team of men seeking to control the governing apparatus by gaining office in a duly constituted election.”.

There are many systems of government. One of the most common ones however, is the presidential system. This system involves the selection of a leader through popular vote, meaning that it is the people who have the power to choose. After electing the president as the head of the executive, the people also elect lawmakers as their representatives in the.

A parliamentary system is “a system of governing in which there is a close interrelationship between the political executive (prime minister and Cabinet) and Parliament (the legislative or law-making body)” (Mintz, Close, and Croci 338), while a presidential system is defined as “a system of governing in which the president and Congress each separately derive their authority from being.

The Parliamentary system vs. The Presidential system. IntroductionThe world of today has many different aspects towards the view of politics. Countries around the world all have diverse components, which makes that state in particular unique. The systems of the world are used to govern the state as its best of the ability according to the ideology and attitude of that particular state.

While within a presidential system the voters vote directly for the president, within the parliamentary system such as in Britain, the prime minister is elected indirectly; constituents essentially vote for a representative, a member of parliament to represent them in parliament; the leader of the majority party which wins becomes the prime minister.

In this essay, I will argue that the presidential system is better than the parliamentary system. In particular, the presidential system has not only principle the separation of powers so that it can be prevented to concentrating power, but also it is more efficient and stable during terms of office.

Compared to the Presidential system, the Parliamentary system is more favourable to a healthy democracy. This essay will discuss the relationship between the Parliamentary and Presidential systems’ executive and legislative powers and the ways they differ from one another.

First, in the presidential system of government, the communication between the lobbyists and the government will be easier and more convenient than in the parliamentary system. In the presidential system, the president is voted by the whole people directly or indirectly, and is responsible for his electors, at the same time the lobbyist and the.

The advantage of holding a parliamentary system of authorities is that this type of administration is extremely flexible and more coordinated in comparing to a presidential system of authorities. ( Weaver pg. 20 This system of authorities is more nimble in taking a hereafter leader than a presidential system which follows a stiff process.

In the article Concentration of Power vs. Lipson 1993) it compares and contrasts many states and their governmental system. For instance Athens and Rome, France and Britain etc., in order to understand a comparison of the strengths and weaknesses of parliamentary and presidential models of government one must analyze countries in which these models are held: Canada vs. America.